How the LGBTQ+ Movement Rebels Against the Story of the Bible
Introduction: The Month of Pride and the Story of Rebellion
Every June, the world erupts into a sea of rainbows. Flags wave. Corporations rebrand. Governments issue proclamations. Even churches, tragically, join the chorus. The cultural script is clear: Pride Month is here, and you will celebrate. But beneath the color and glitter lies something far older and far darker than most realize.
The rainbow is not a human invention. It belongs to God. And like so much in our world today, what God created as a symbol of mercy has been hijacked as a banner of rebellion.
The LGBTQ+ movement is not simply a matter of politics, or sociology, or even morality. It is a deeply theological act—a reenactment of the oldest rebellion in the cosmos. To understand what is unfolding, we must step back and trace this story from Eden to Babel, from ancient altars to modern parades.
The Garden Replayed: The Lie of Self-Definition
The first rebellion wasn’t sexual. It was theological.
In Genesis 3, the serpent posed a deceptively simple question:
“Indeed, has God said…?” Genesis 3:1
In that single question, Satan introduced the fatal notion that truth is negotiable—that divine boundaries are optional. Adam and Eve, created in God’s image, were invited to seize the authority to redefine reality itself. You shall be like God,the serpent whispered (Genesis 3:5).
Fast forward several millennia: the LGBTQ+ movement echoes that same primal lie with astonishing precision:
- “Has God really said that gender is binary?”
- “Has God truly defined marriage?”
- “Is sexual morality really fixed?”
- “Isn’t love just love?”
What began in the garden as a whispered temptation has now become the shouting mantra of Western culture. Today, man declares himself not merely autonomous but sovereign, redefining identity at will. “Male and female He created them” (Genesis 1:27) is replaced by “I am whatever I declare myself to be.”
It’s not accidental that the movement chose the word Pride. The very disposition God opposes (James 4:6) has become the virtue our culture demands we celebrate.
We might say the serpent’s marketing department has simply updated the slogans for modern branding. Back then: “You will be like God.” Now: “Live your truth.”
The Nephilim Parallel: Crossing Boundaries
But Eden’s rebellion wasn’t the last. Genesis 6 introduces another dark chapter:
The sons of God saw that the daughters of mankind were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose. Genesis 6:2
This episode—commonly called the “Divine Council rebellion”—involved spiritual beings crossing boundaries God had set, producing an unnatural offspring (Nephilim) that further corrupted creation.
At first glance, this may seem far removed from the LGBTQ+ debate. But the parallel is sobering:
- The Nephilim event was a boundary violation—spiritual beings merging with humans, defying the distinct categories God ordained.
- LGBTQ+ ideology likewise rejects God-ordained creational boundaries: male and female, marriage and family, biology and identity.
Whether in ancient angelic rebellion or modern gender fluidity, the heart issue remains the same:
“I will not accept the categories God has created. I will cross the boundaries and redefine what it means to be human.”
This is no coincidence. It is the predictable fruit of a cosmos at war with its Creator.
In short: if Genesis 6 gave us hybrid giants, modern rebellion gives us drag queens reading to toddlers at the public library. Same spirit. Different costumes.
Babel Reconstructed: Global Pride as Unified Rebellion
The third great rebellion of Genesis occurs in chapter 11. Here humanity unites once again:
Come, let’s build ourselves a city, and a tower whose top will reach into heaven, and let’s make a name for ourselves. Genesis 11:4
Babel represents not just a tower, but a system: global unification in defiance of God’s rule. Man would build his own identity, his own kingdom, and his own salvation apart from divine authority.
Today, we are watching Babel rise again.
- Pride Month is not a grassroots festival—it’s a global orthodoxy.
- Corporations, governments, media empires, and even religious institutions demand full affirmation.
- Dissent is punished; compliance is rewarded.
What was once a localized tower is now a worldwide movement, enforced by cultural gatekeepers from Washington to Silicon Valley to the United Nations. The LGBTQ+ movement functions as a kind of global Babel, uniting nations under a shared defiance of God’s design.
You might say we’ve traded bricks and mortar for hashtags and HR training modules. But the tower keeps rising.
The Historical Road to Pride: Seeds of the Modern Rebellion
This rebellion didn’t appear overnight. It is the bitter harvest of a long ideological war:
| Era | Key Development | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Pagan Antiquity | Sexual perversions in Canaanite, Greco-Roman cultures (Leviticus 18; Romans 1) | Early normalization of sexual rebellion |
| The Enlightenment (1700s) | Human autonomy, rejection of Scripture | Man enthroned as his own authority |
| 19th Century | Freud, Marx, Darwin | Sexuality psychologized and politicized |
| 20th Century | Sexual revolution (1960s–1970s) | Biblical sexual ethics dismantled |
| 21st Century | Transgender revolution | Identity completely untethered from biology |
The modern LGBTQ+ revolution is simply the most visible manifestation of a far older war against the authority of the Word of God.
The Rainbow: From Covenant Sign to Cultural Mockery
Perhaps nothing encapsulates this cosmic mockery better than the hijacking of the rainbow.
Originally, the rainbow was God’s covenant promise to Noah:
I have set My bow in the cloud, and it shall serve as a sign of a covenant between Me and the earth. Genesis 9:13
It was a sign of mercy in the face of judgment—a visual reminder that God restrains His wrath even when mankind deserves it.
But today, that very symbol is waved as a banner of prideful defiance. What God gave as a sign of mercy after judgmenthas been twisted into a celebration of the very sins that provoke judgment.
It is hard to find a more chilling fulfillment of Isaiah 5:20:
“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil.”
The irony is profound: the rainbow still belongs to God. And when judgment comes, the rainbow will still be draped around His throne (Revelation 4:3).
The rainbow isn’t available for rebranding. God holds the copyright—and He isn’t selling the rights.
The Gospel Response: Truth and Compassion in an Age of Rebellion
The Christian response cannot be mere cultural critique. It must be deeply theological, profoundly compassionate, and unflinchingly courageous.
- We must tell the truth — Sexual sin destroys. Rebellion against God leads to judgment. Compassion demands that we call sin what it is.
- We must offer hope — The blood of Christ can cleanse any sin (1 Corinthians 6:9–11).
- We must expect hostility — Light exposes darkness. But we fear God, not man.
- We must remain unmoved — The rainbow belongs to God. The earth is His. And in the end, He will restore His creation under the righteous reign of Christ.
Conclusion: God Is Not Mocked
Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. Galatians 6:7, LSB
The cultural rainbow may fly for a season. But in the end, every knee will bow (Philippians 2:10–11)—including those now shouting “Pride!” The story does not end with rebellion. It ends with the return of the King.
End Note
This post may offend some. It should convict all. But it flows not from hate—but from love for God’s truth, love for His design, and love for souls trapped in a movement that offers only death masquerading as freedom.
References
- Beale, G. K. (2011). A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. Baker Academic.
- Calvin, J. (2009). Commentary on Genesis. Baker Books.
- Cooper, D. L. (1940). The God of Israel. Biblical Research Society. (Note: Limited public link; available through Ariel Ministries and select theological libraries.)
- DeYoung, K. (2015). What Does the Bible Really Teach About Homosexuality? Crossway.
- Foh, S. T. (1975). What Is the Woman’s Desire? Westminster Theological Journal, 37(3), 376–383. (JSTOR access may be required).
- Fruchtenbaum, A. G. (1989). Israelology: The Missing Link in Systematic Theology. Ariel Ministries.
- Grudem, W. (2020). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (2nd ed.) Zondervan Academic.
- Heiser, M. S. (2015). The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible. Lexham Press.
- MacArthur, J. F. (2020). The MacArthur Bible Commentary. Thomas Nelson.
- Mohler, R. A. (2023). The Gathering Storm: Secularism, Culture, and the Church. Thomas Nelson.
- Moo, D. J. (1996). The Epistle to the Romans (NICNT). Eerdmans.
- Pierce, R. W. (2020). Eden to Babel: A Biblical Theology of the Primeval History. P&R Publishing.
- Sproul, R. C. (1996). Essential Truths of the Christian Faith. Tyndale House Publishers.
- Vanhoozer, K. J. (2005). The Drama of Doctrine: A Canonical-Linguistic Approach to Christian Theology.Westminster John Knox Press.
- Walton, J. H. (2001). Genesis: The NIV Application Commentary. Zondervan.
- Wright, C. J. H. (2004). Old Testament Ethics for the People of God. InterVarsity Press.
Scripture quotations: Legacy Standard Bible (LSB). Copyright © 2021 by The Lockman Foundation. LSB Official Site
